Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Gabriele Piraino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tseng vs Piraino analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Gabriele Piraino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tseng 0 - 0 Piraino
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tseng has won 50.66% of points on their second serve, while Piraino has won 48.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tseng, in recent form, has won 52.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Piraino has won 50.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.03% and 37.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tseng has saved 63.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Piraino has saved 55.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tseng has won 64.62% of matches played (W/L 42/ 23), with Piraino winning 53.97% (W/L 34/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 111/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Piraino has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 91/ 72), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21), where as Piraino has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tseng has played against opponents with an average rank of 335.37 while Piraino has played against players with an average rank of 269.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tseng has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Piraino has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tseng has converted 45.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Piraino has converted 45.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
161
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
506
Rank
478
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
60% (223-148)
Career Total W/L
55% (102-82)
65% (30-16)
YTD W/L
58% (18-13)
$180,215
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Chun Hsin Tseng vs Gabriele Piraino For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tseng VS Piraino
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Gabriele Piraino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (30/16) | 58% (18/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (62/43) | 56% (38/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (517/468) | 52% (327/307) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (24/8) | 62% (13/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 123 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 119 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:59 | 1:49:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 324.78 | 252.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1765/3251) | 63% (1236/1969) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1223/1765) | 62% (772/1236) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (752/1486) | 48% (354/733) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (143/321) | 45% (101/222) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1268/3116) | 42% (832/1961) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (30/15) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (15/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (29/45) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 79% (11/14) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (24/24) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (24/0) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (22/6) | 13% (15/2) |
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Alessandro Pecci
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Gianluca Mager
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Carlos Taberner
50%
(
51 of
103)
1st Serve %
74%
(
76 of
103)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
40%
(
21 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Laslo Djere
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Michael Vrbensky
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Vit Kopriva
42%
(
24 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriele Piraino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Gabriele Piraino
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Francesco Forti
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Gabriele Piraino
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Gabriele Piraino
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Gabriele Piraino
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Ludovico Vaccari
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Gabriele Piraino
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Tristan Boyer
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Ethan Quinn
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tseng Vs Piraino Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tseng are available here and Piraino photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chun Hsin Tseng
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
